COS' WE ARE WINNERS FOREVER

I feel so sad everytime i realise how slow i am. My brother's going for the queensland thing in dec and he doesnt even seem excited. In fact, i think he's indifferent. Oh hah if I could be like that. Pity. But i guess it's worse by the fact that my brother does this and that and it makes it all the more closer to me and i cant do it. That's why it hurts.

Yaya now i have an ri towel yay. For free haha. But do we really have to go back to school during the holidays for training? Gahh honestly, school training is quite useless. Hmph not looking forward to it >.<

NOW thanks to some people. I. Am. Undecided. Lit or Hist? Let's see.
Lit has slau, jotham and tedric (u traitor!!). Gahhh. Ok list the good points of taking LIT. Honestly the lit people are kinda the special and different people i think. Hist people will be the mass multitude of unvarying geeks and posers and lapdogs. I really would prefer the lit people i think. Secondly, in hist, practically 3/4 of the sec 2 gep are taking it 0.0 Gahhh it will be so common and unfun, EVERYONE will be taking hist. Eww. Those are the major factors. And i think i would much rather be a lit person really. Lastly, lit is compulsory if i wanna take the humanities scholarship in jc.
Now why i should take hist and not lit. I much much prefer the subjects in hist. Yeah much more interesting than king lear and his daughters. Secondly, i much much prefer the way of assessment. As in the type of essays and all. Well obviously, cos i find them easy and score well in them -.-" And dont require much creativity, it's all in ur skill or whatever =)
Hist is a gamble for a super nice teacher and a not so nice teacher. Lit is a nice teachers. So what? Tedric, jotham, SLYP and slau this is all ur fault! ;_; i feel so torn again. whywhywhy am i so indecisive.

Lit concerns the type of person i wanna be and be with. Hist concerns more of my marks and score and knowledge. So WHICH.